How do you begin to explain the importance of such a day to somebody whose response is likely to question its validity, its point and purpose? And is it ironic anyway that we should stop to think of the importance of celebrating women on just one day of the year? Well, let’s have a little think, shall we.
Women have always been the absolute backbone of every society. We carry the babies, the physical and emotional burdens and the bollocks that life throws our way. We are damned if we do and damned if we don’t. If we cry, we are weak. If we assert ourselves, we are bossy and unfeminine. The rules of society were written by men, for men. In the deepest, darkest past, no man stopped to think about whether the great patrimony respected and provided justice to a woman as much as it did to a him. Clearly not. The clue is in the word. The power was in men’s hands, the wealth was in their pockets and their voices were the ones listened to. It would be great to be able to say that all of that has changed but sadly it hasn’t. It has improved but parity has not been achieved and, where people claim that it has been, it is often under the guise of lip service. Women are still paid less than men. Women, by dint of having a womb, will always have to make choices about when and indeed whether to start a family, knowing that it will impact her life choices more than the father’s. Obviously there has been development in this area. Paternity leave is wonderful. Stay-at-home dads, hats off! Men pushing pushchairs, feeding babies, changing nappies. This is all very cute and laudable but it is mostly a box ticking exercise because when push comes to shove and your child has Book Day, Sports Day, a mufti day, a spelling test or a school trip, you can pretty much guarantee that it will be mum who does the forward thinking and the staring at the calendar to double check that everything is where it ought to be. And why shouldn’t she if this is her full-time chosen job? I couldn’t agree more. Hats off to her too. But why should she if she is working as hard outside the home as her partner. The balance of responsibility will always tip towards her.
In years past, I remember many a raging argument with the boys from the local equivalent boys’ Catholic school about feminism and discrimination. Even the most forward-thinking of them was still a product of his parents, the apron wearer and the trouser clad. I imagine lots of men were horrified by the challenges to the Shake n Vac brigade. But she looks so happy with her vacuum cleaner. I have nothing against allowing women to drive as long as it’s a Hoover. Hahaha. That kind of joke. So insidious, always brewing beneath the surface. We were fodder for their provocation. If we didn’t laugh, we weren’t the dollies who would be picked to dance or invited home. Big mouth. Scary. Too much to say for herself. I remember feeling like I just wasn’t pretty or feminine enough because my thoughts were not gentle and girl-like, they were angry-with-the-world thoughts. I don’t think young women today truly grasp what we had to do to get to this place we are in now. But what a place. In theory, we have employment laws to protect us, to fight our cause and to ensure than no woman is judged on her age, attractiveness, sexiness and marital status during the interview process. Said law will also ensure her fair return to work and promotion prospects should she become pregnant. We can walk the streets at night wearing what we want, knowing that we will be safe on our journey home and that the law will bring any crime against us to justice. And we can close our doors, in the understanding that our homely haven will keep us safe from abuse and coercion because legislation looks after us like that. As I said, in theory.
As women we are fed a diet of romantic clap-trap designed to make us feel incomplete without a man by our side. We are worthless if we are not loved, idolised, desired and fawned over. The problem is, far too amny women spend their lives waiting for this instead of learning to love themselves for who they are. Social media has become the new patriarchy and the irony is that it is being fuelled by other women whose interpretation of power and taking control, places them in an even tighter straight jacket. As if lung-busting, whale-boned corsets, three-hour beehive hairdos and pelvic-tilting stiletto heels were not enough, our younger generation of emancipated women are brain-washed into pumping up the volume, scraping, balding their hairy bits, filling furrows, pouting, war-painting and general all-round self DIYing of their already lovely faces and bodies. Are big lips meant to emulate the arse of a baboon to make the mating game more fun? Is the stretched skin and ballooned face to prove that you look younger but obviously aren’t because no normal human being looks like that? The straight-jacket chokes us all. Middle aged women compete with their daughters to look younger but the distortions and masked horrors flash like a neon sign of ‘look what I just did to myself’. I don’t have wrinkles anymore but I look like a stretched sock over a melon.
And then we have the changing of a surname once married. What is that all about? I can think of no logical or fair explanation for it other than the offspring sharing the same name as their parents. You might as well stamp ‘property of’ across her forehead or ‘spoken for, hands off’ or ‘has reached the pinnacle of achievement because she is no longer a sad singleton’. A man is given a name at birth and keeps it forever. A woman undergoes transformations which build her or belittle her or remould her or shape her and God forbid she should divorce because in most cases, the woman keeps her ex’s surname for eternity just to prove that the children are hers. It is a total nonsense. People will say we all have a choice but this has never really been a choice because those women choosing to keep their maiden name (maiden! Think about it!) on marrying and to not use the Mrs badge of honour have been vilified as societal Bolsheviks, putting their principles before their family. But my husband wants me to take his name. Really? Why? To make him feel good? To add to the trophy cabinet? To make HIM feel complete? Oh it’s so romantic. Ladies and gentle, please be upstanding for Mr and Mrs Him and his Her. The conquistador has found his gold and put a serial number on it so that it is instantly recognisable to everybody. Mrs John Smith. Jesus, that is beyond degrading. To steal your first name too once you have signed that bit of paper. The vanishing woman, the fader into his aura, the shadow standing behind his cabinet.
Now, I know I am being blunt because I am and I don’t give a shit but using tradition as an argument for keeping in place ‘rules and ‘regulations’ just because it has always been done that way is tantamount to stopping the clock of evolution. Cavemen dragged their women to their caves, by their hair we are told. And because things were just so, the cavewomen took it, not once tempted to pick up that club and smash his domineering head with it. Was it because she wasn’t equipped to go and hunt for herself? Did anybody ever ask her if she fancied a jolly jog after a hairy mammoth? Was she that physically weak that she didn’t know how to run or stretch a catapult? There are plenty of things that women didn’t do simply because they were not allowed. Katherine Switzer was manhandled in Boston in 1967 for joining the male marathon runners despite the fact that she was a registered competitor. Jock Semple, spotting she was a woman – breasts are not for bobbing about, my girl – tried to stop her in her tracks. What in God’s name was so offensive about a woman having a run? As a consequence of that race and, presumably to prevent any man being out-run by a female, women were banned from competing in races against men. It took a long time for things to change and for the ‘fairer’ sex to prove that their wombs and ovaries would not drop out if they got a move on. For God’s sake, women have been run off their feet their whole lives and with no medal at the end of it.
And one final thing and then I will stop. Can somebody explain to me why younger women have adopted the growly drawl when they speak? Is it to sound sexy or stupid? Sexy because that is how to bag the bloke, by elongating those ecstatic pleasure-sounding vowels? Stupid because that is how to, well, bag the bloke because most men cannot cope with a female who is more intelligent than them. This sweet, sickly gravel speak is the spoken equivalent of Botox. I can only assume that influencers are to blame here just as they are for baboon lips, terrifying eyebrows and buttocks and boobs that defy gravity. Come bloody on, my good gals. Love yourselves, accept your defects, celebrate your natural assets, make your own fair rules, accept nothing but respect and justice and don’t bow to any man who belittles, condescends or expects you to wear a mask on your face or across your mind. And one last, last thing. We need one another. Let’s not play into the hands of a society that pits us one female against the other. We all have struggles and opinions and we shouldn’t flick the bitch word around so readily. It is ugly and makes our would-be equal footing wobble because it reinforces stereotypes and sets already cruel and sexist tongues wagging. If you do one thing today, let it be to smile at as many females as possible, knowing that you know that they know that you know what they know. Let’s also spare a thought for those women still living under the cosh in medieval societies treating their female population like dog poo. If we don’t want to scream and shout for ourselves, let’s do it for them. And, finally, a big smile too for those fabulous guys out there who get it and can smile at a woman and enjoy her conversation, admire her brains and respect her opinions without looking down her blouse.